Skip to content
All categories

learning

345 posts

Exploration, RL Theory, Multitask Learning, and Open Problems | Berkeley CS285 Lectures 19–25

The final seven lectures move from exploration and theoretical limits through two review lectures to advanced exploration, multitask RL, and unresolved research problems.

The CPU, GPU, and H100 Boundary | Berkeley CS285 Topic Guide

Five assignments move from CPU-friendly imitation learning to H100-based LLM RL and six-hour offline-RL runs; self-learners should use three compute tiers instead of copying the entire enrolled workflow.

Imitation Learning, Distribution Shift, and RL Basics | Berkeley CS285 Lectures 1–4

The first four lectures move from behavioral cloning to MDPs; HW1 turns distribution shift into an observable failure through MSE policies, DAgger, and flow matching.

From Variational Inference and LLM RL to Offline RL | Berkeley CS285 Lectures 11–18

L11–18 connect control as inference, LLM RL, model-based RL, and offline RL, with HW4 and HW5 providing two compute-intensive implementations.

Policy Gradients, Actor-Critic, DQN, and SAC | Berkeley CS285 Lectures 5–10

L5–10 build the deep-RL core through policy- and value-based routes; HW2 is CPU-friendly, while HW3's Atari and HalfCheetah runs can require hours of GPU time.

Deep Reinforcement Learning: From Decision Concepts to Policy Learning and Experiments | Berkeley CS285 Course Overview

Spring 2026 CS185/285 publishes slides for 25 lectures, nine discussion units, five assignments, and starter code; lecture recordings are public on the RAIL YouTube channel, but Ed, Gradescope, and office hours remain enrolled-only, while HW4 defaults to an H100, so this is not a zero-cost open course.

Inference-time Compute, Reasoning, and Embodied Agents | Berkeley CS288 Topic Guide

Units 15–18 place NLP models inside perception, reasoning, tool, and environment loops; the question shifts from next-token prediction to allocating inference compute and validating multi-step action.

From N-grams and Word Representations to Text Classification | Berkeley CS288 Topic Guide

The first four units make text countable, representable, and classifiable; A1 then moves from n-grams and perceptrons to an NBOW MLP.

Language Models and NLP: From Foundational Representations to Retrieval and Agents | Berkeley CS288 Course Overview

CS288 moves from n-grams to RAG, reasoning, and agents through 18 public slide units and three assignments; Berkeley-only recordings make this an A3 materials route, not a public video course.

Pre-training, Post-training, Generation, and Evaluation | Berkeley CS288 Topic Guide

Units 08–12 turn a base model into an interactive system: pre-training establishes capability, post-training shapes behavior, and generation plus evaluation determine how outputs are used.

Turning Retrieval, RAG, and Advanced Architectures into a System | Berkeley CS288 Topic Guide

Units 13–14 connect models to external knowledge; A3 requires data collection, QA annotation, indexing, and ablations under CPU and latency constraints.

Sequence Models, Seq2Seq, and Transformers | Berkeley CS288 Topic Guide

Units 05–07 move from recurrent state to encoder-decoder models, then rewrite the information path with attention and Transformer blocks.

Advanced AI and Machine Learning: From Logical Planning to Generative Models | CMU 07-380 Course Overview

07-380 Fall 2026 is the first offering of CMU's new AI II: 26 lectures from logic, planning and optimization to probabilistic graphs and generative systems. As of the 2026-09-29 course site, the Lec1–9 slides, PR1–6 notes, Rec1–5 (with solutions) and HW1–3 are public, and this site now has 14 lecture-by-lecture guides for them. Slides after Lec10, HW4–7 and the final project are not out yet, so the course as a whole is still A2.

Find ML Foundation Gaps with Mathematics and Python | CMU 10-301 Assignment 1

HW1 is written and programming work: mathematical and CS foundations followed by a majority-vote classifier.

From Information Calculations to a Complete Decision Tree | CMU 10-301 Assignment 2

HW2 moves from hand-calculated entropy and mutual information to an end-to-end tree learner, predictor, and evaluator.

Compare K-NN, Perceptron, and Linear Regression | CMU 10-301 Assignment 3

HW3 is written work: a decision-tree review followed by K-NN, Perceptron, and Linear Regression through inductive bias, errors, and model selection.

Turn Logistic Regression Likelihood into a Classifier | CMU 10-301 Assignment 4

HW4 joins probabilistic interpretation, cross-entropy gradients, and implementation into one traceable training pipeline.

Expose Neural Networks and Backpropagation with NumPy | CMU 10-301 Assignment 5

HW5 avoids automatic differentiation so learners must track forward shapes, caches, and backward gradients themselves.

Learning Theory, MLE/MAP, and Fairness Metrics | CMU 10-301 Assignment 6

HW6 combines generalization, MLE/MAP, probabilistic learning, fairness metrics, and social impact in one written assignment about assumptions and tradeoffs.

Move from Basic Neural Networks to Deep Learning | CMU 10-301 Assignment 7

HW7 builds on HW5 backpropagation to address deep-model architecture and training failures, emphasizing diagnosis over merely adding layers.