Video Generation: Modeling the Time Axis | CMU 10-423 Lecture 25
Video Generation: Modeling the Time Axis | CMU 10-423 Lecture 25
Page 28 of 129
Video Generation: Modeling the Time Axis | CMU 10-423 Lecture 25
Separate three world representations and evidence of action control, then examine consensus costs and corrigibility theorem conditions.
A complete worked example and answered variations for LoRA: What Changes When Most Weights Stay Frozen.
Use the public practice exam to diagnose assumptions, data flow, and evaluation errors through a worked probability example.
Open-ended evolution changes agent code and workflows; archives preserve branches, while held-out tests assess generalization.
Program candidates need requirement-based counterexamples; speed matters only after correctness checks pass.
Retrieval, trained KV representations, and cache reuse address different bottlenecks; speed does not guarantee freshness.
On 2026-10-07 Spotify grouped Confidence, Portal, Xirp and its Backstage plugins under one brand, Spotify Technology. Its bet: once AI makes code cheap, judgment becomes the bottleneck and shared organizational context becomes the asset. Revenue is undisclosed; Confidence has public pricing and a free plan; Xirp is a macOS-only beta.
More candidates increase the chance of a correct solution; credible selection turns that chance into delivered success.
A correct final answer does not validate its derivation; step feedback locates errors, but verifiers still need checking.
Observations, tests, and principle-based critique supply different signals; identify the signal before choosing revision or training.
Distinguish search, parallel execution, and training; subtask artifacts must fulfill the original task criterion.
Useful training feedback must distinguish candidates; filtering, relative advantages, and sampling determine the learning signal.
Candidate search selects solutions; retrieval fills knowledge gaps. Both require specifications and checkable evidence.
Human task duration, artifact quality, and citation support measure different things; evaluate both execution and deliverables.
Diversity, verification, task selection, and efficiency are distinct bottlenecks; experiments need holdouts and falsifiable hypotheses.
An RL system samples with an inference engine, assigns rewards through verification, recomputes logprobs and gradients in a trainer, then synchronizes new weights back to inference. Walk through these five stages in an invented example before examining caching, preserved histories, and asynchronous updates.
Lecture 13 is about limiting what agents can access and do. The slides open with five real incidents, sort them into four threat models (malicious user, prompt injection, agent error, improper means), then give four layers of defense: red teaming and safety training, sandboxes and credential brokering, monitoring, and safety evaluation. The easiest point to miss: hiding the API key does not stop an agent from misusing the access behind it.
Graham Neubig uses OpenHands, which he leads, to explain framework design: how coding agents evolved from HumanEval, SWE-bench and Devin to 2026's long-running, interruptible, parallel work; the parts of the Software Agent SDK (LLM, tools, conversation, condenser, workspace, confirmation policy); the single- vs. multi-agent trade-off; local vs. cloud and four interfaces (IDE, GUI, CLI, integrations); automations wired to issues and PRs; and revising skills from past trajectories.
Agency means believing you can change things and taking action. Read the guide, practice three continuous clips with original audio and source-player English captions, and describe a change you could make at work.