Anthropic says Claude writes about 90% of Claude Code's code. This guide walks through their review flow: every PR passes seven layers, human approvals scale with risk from zero to two, and the goal is at most one human per change with no rise in reverts.
Uncle Bob's 4.18M-view post of 2026/7/23 isn't a manifesto — it's a reply to an engineer who started in 1983 asking whether needing to understand code psychologically makes him old-fashioned. And he doesn't skip the code entirely: his 6/1 four-stage pipeline post says 'I spot check the code,' with thresholds of crap ≤ 6 (convention is 30) and mutation runs that kill all survivors. Plus a breakdown of his open-sourced Acceptance-Pipeline-Specification and the three metric blind spots Grady Booch names.
Cloudflare ran a Multi-Agent Code Review system internally for 30 days — 131K reviews, median 3 minutes. This post breaks down their architecture and compares it with solutions from Anthropic, GitHub, CodeRabbit, Greptile, and others.
Three main classification systems dominate: Conventional Comments (label-based), Google's severity prefixes (Nit/Optional/FYI), and SonarQube's four quadrants (Bug/Vulnerability/Code Smell/Hotspot). AI review tools have each developed their own taxonomies, but the core dimensions consistently converge on four areas: correctness, security, performance, and maintainability.