Skip to content
All tags

#ai-and-learning

3 posts

What Research Measured on AI-Written Teaching Materials and AI Tutors: Content Error Rates, Human Screening, Student Ratings, and Tutoring Experiments

When GPT-3.5 wrote solution hints for algebra and statistics problems directly, both the answer and the steps were wrong for 32% of the problems; after a human screened every problem, no difference in learning was detected between those hints and hints written by human tutors. Randomized experiments on AI tutors point both ways: an unguarded chatbot made high school students do worse on an exam, while the positive results mostly came bundled with worked solutions written for each problem, a teacher in the room, or extra class time. None of the studies tested the same content again after a delay.

How to Practice Workplace English Speaking: Shadowing, Scenario Drills, AI Apps, and Meeting Phrases

30 minutes a day for 12 weeks — combine shadowing, scenario practice, and AI apps to go from 'I understand but can't speak' to holding your own in meetings.

AI Makes Things Smooth Exactly Where They Should Be Hard: What Generative AI Does to Learning

The single most-cited meta-analysis on ChatGPT in education (g = 0.867, ~500k views) was retracted by Nature in April 2026. But the positive finding was not overturned — the issue is that it measures performance while the AI is available. Bastani's PNAS RCT measured something else: +48% accuracy during practice with GPT-4, then 17% below never-users once access was removed.